Skip to main content
· 9/22/1992

Bowie v. Arder

Citations

  • 490 N.W.2d 568
  • 441 Mich. 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an established custodial environment does not establish a substantive basis on which to sue for custody under the CCA
  • explaining that \circuit courts do not have jurisdiction in matters in which jurisdiction is given exclusively by constitutional provision or by statute to another court\
  • holding between parents and nonparents, the mere de facto custody of the child by the nonparents was not enough to invoke standing for nonparents, unless nonparents were legal guardians
  • explaining that errors in a court’s exercise of its jurisdiction cannot be collaterally attacked
  • explaining that, in order to have standing, a party must have “some real interest in the cause of action, or a legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the subject matter of the controversy”
  • discussing the historical equitable jurisdiction of the chancery courts over children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levin, Cavanagh, Boyle, Riley, Griffin, Mallett, Brickley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.