Michigan Court of Appeals· 12/15/2009

In Re HRC

Citations

781 N.W.2d 105
286 Mich. App. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that DHHS is “not required to provide reunification services when termination of parental rights is the agency’s goal.”
explaining that this Court need only conclude that the trial court did not clearly err as to the existence of one ground for termination
noting that DHHS is “not required to provide reunification services when termination of parental rights is the agency’s goal.”
noting that “this Court has held that a respondent in a child protective proceeding lacks standing to challenge the effectiveness of the child’s attorney”
finding that, where “at least one ground for termination existed, we need not consider the additional grounds upon which the trial court based its decision”
explaining that this Court need only conclude that the trial court did not clearly err as to the existence of one ground for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Jansen, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re HRC

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

In Re HRC
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-12-23

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.