In re Sanders
Citations
- 495 Mich. 394
- 852 N.W.2d 524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that due process requires that each parent receive a specific adjudication of his or her unfitness
- holding that the right to control and custody of children constitutionally must extend equally to a parent, despite the other parent being the direct subject of neglect proceedings for supervision of children
- holding that the fact that there was a “serious dispute” on the record concerning whether the respondent had “a healthy bond” with her children supported that termination of her parental rights was in the children’s best interests
- holding that the fact that there was a “serious dispute” on the record concerning whether the respondent had “a healthy bond” with her children supported that termination of her parental rights was in the children’s best interests
- holding that the fact that there was a “serious dispute” on the record concerning whether the respondent “had a healthy bond of any sort with her children” supported that termination of her parental rights was in the children’s best interests
- holding that the fact that there was a “serious dispute” on the record concerning whether the respondent “had a healthy bond of any sort with her children” supported that termination of her parental rights was in the children’s best interests
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanagh, Kelly, Markman, McCormack, Viviano, Young, Zahra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court· 2015-07-29· cited 1,872×
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-01-29· cited 732×
- In re LaFrance MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-09-23· cited 271×
- People v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court· 2018-06-20· cited 145×
- In re MartinMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-06-23· cited 124×
- In re McCarrickMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 68×
- Varran v. GrannemanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 65×
- O’connell v. Director of ElectionsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-06-23· cited 59×
- In re PopsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 41×
- Mayor of Cadillac v. BlackburnMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-08-26· cited 38×
- In re KanjiaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30· cited 37×
- in Re I M Long MinorMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-11-20· cited 36×
- Brooks Williamson & Associates, Inc. v. Mayflower Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2014-11-13· cited 33×
- In re Detmer/BeaudryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2017-08-22· cited 33×
- IN RE TA.L. IN RE A.L. IN PETITION OF R.W. & A.W. IN RE PETITION OF E.A.A.H. AND T.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-08· cited 31×
- Keagan Farris v. John H McKaig IIIMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 28×
- Roberts v. SalmiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 24×
- in Re Forfeiture of 2000 Gmc Denali and ContentsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-08-02· cited 24×
- In re BlakemanMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-10-25· cited 24×
- William L Luna v. Carrie Marie RegnierMichigan Court of Appeals· 2018-10-18· cited 20×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 2,289×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court· 1949-02-28· cited 1,120×
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & ReformSupreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 1,061×
- In Re MasonMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-05-26· cited 658×
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsSecond Circuit· 1999-10-13· cited 493×
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 490×
- Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 431×
- In Re RoodMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-04-02· cited 364×
- In Re JKMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-05-20· cited 296×
Other cases named In re Sanders
72 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.
- In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 198×
- In Re SandersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 59×
- In Re SandersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-10-12· cited 40×
- In Re SandersW.D. Texas· 2007-10-18· cited 36×
- In Re SandersE.D. Missouri· 1987-01-29· cited 25×
- In Re SandersSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-08-30· cited 21×
- In Re SandersD. Kansas· 1986-04-17· cited 17×
- In Re SandersN.D. Ohio· 2000-01-19· cited 16×
- In Re SandersD. Kansas· 1981-08-19· cited 13×
- In Re SandersS.D. Ohio· 1989-04-26· cited 12×
- In re SandersNew York Court of Chancery· 1834-01-07· cited 11×
- In Re SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-10-28· cited 10×
- In Re SandersM.D. Florida· 1987-04-06· cited 10×
- In Re SandersE.D. New York· 2009-07-24· cited 10×
- In Re SandersD. Kansas· 1983-04-08· cited 7×
- In Re SandersN.D. Alabama· 2006-04-18· cited 6×
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1940-02-05· cited 6×
- In Re SandersD. Montana· 1986-04-16· cited 5×
- In Re SandersE.D. Michigan· 2003-03-18· cited 5×
- In Re SandersNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-06-26· cited 5×
- In re SandersN.D. Georgia· 1937-07-29· cited 5×
- In Re SandersE.D. Michigan· 2007-05-18· cited 4×
- In re SandersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina· 1892-11-14· cited 4×
- In Re SandersM.D. Alabama· 2011-07-12· cited 2×
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1967-06-29· cited 2×
- In re SandersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-08-01· cited 2×
- In re SandersMichigan Supreme Court· 2015-07-01· cited 2×
- In re SandersS.D. Florida· 2015-11-18· cited 2×
- In re SandersOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-28· cited 2×
- In re SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-13· cited 1×
- In re SandersSupreme Court· 2010-04-26· cited 1×
- In re SandersSupreme Court· 2010-11-15· cited 1×
- In re SandersD. South Carolina· 2014-07-28· cited 1×
- In re SandersD. South Carolina· 2014-09-26· cited 1×
- In re SandersS.D. Florida· 2015-02-26· cited 1×
- In Re SandersSupreme Court· 1993-12-06
- In Re SandersMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-01-27
- In Re SandersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1900-01-01
- In re SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2013-10-15
- In re SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-29
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1927-02-15
- In re SandersSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-11-22
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1958-06-19
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1958-10-16
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-05-05
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-01-22
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-02-11
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-11-15
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-03-27
- In re SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-03-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.