La Tourette v. McMaster
Citations
- 248 U.S. 465
- 39 S. Ct. 160
- 63 L. Ed. 362
- 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2274
Syllabus
<p>The power of a State over the subject of insurance extends to the regulation of those who may carry on the business as brokers representing both insurer and insured. P. 467.</p> <p>A law of' South Carolina provides that only such persons shall be licensed to act as brokers to represent citizens for the placing of insurance with insurers in that State or elsewhere as are residents of the State and have been licensed insurance agents of the State for at least two years. Construed as requiring local residence, as distinguished from citizenship, held, within the police power; and that it does not deprive a citizen and resident of another State, desiring to act as such broker in South Carolina, of liberty or property, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, or discriminate against him, in violation of § 2 of Article IV of the Constitution. Pp. 467-8.</p>
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court· 1939-06-05· cited 2,178×
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 1,848×
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 408×
- United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 298×
- Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 267×
- Hicklin v. OrbeckSupreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 258×
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 217×
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court· 1929-05-13· cited 209×
- O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1931-01-05· cited 202×
- Maxwell v. BugbeeSupreme Court· 1919-11-10· cited 185×
- Osborn v. OzlinSupreme Court· 1940-04-22· cited 160×
- Daniel v. Family Security Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1949-02-28· cited 153×
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1925-04-17· cited 151×
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. HarrisonSupreme Court· 1937-05-24· cited 104×
- California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. MaloneySupreme Court· 1951-04-23· cited 100×
- United States v. BurnisonSupreme Court· 1950-03-13· cited 94×
- Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 82×
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 65×
- In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-04-26· cited 53×
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1922-06-28· cited 50×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.