California Supreme Court· 4/26/1940
In Re Fuller
Citations
- 15 Cal. 2d 425
- 102 P.2d 321
- 1940 Cal. LEXIS 231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As to the exempted groups, the legislature was reinvested with the same control over them as it had prior to the enactment of the Usury Law:”
- with the “not” accidentally omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court· 1949-03-11· cited 119×
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1948-08-13· cited 107×
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-07-14· cited 96×
- Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-04-17· cited 91×
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1953-03-10· cited 87×
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 79×
- Gospel Army v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-11-20· cited 69×
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-05-18· cited 50×
- Dribin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-05-29· cited 40×
- Winston v. Personal Finance Co. of Pine Bluff, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1952-05-19· cited 39×
- People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal· 1945-07-27· cited 37×
- Ferrante v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-12-06· cited 32×
- City of Walnut Creek v. SilveiraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-02-01· cited 31×
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-02-21· cited 28×
- Doyle v. Board of Barber ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-08-21· cited 27×
- Klett v. Security Acceptance Co.California Supreme Court· 1952-04-17· cited 26×
- Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-11-24· cited 21×
- People v. Fairfax Family Fund, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1964-12-21· cited 13×
- People v. AsamotoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-02-21· cited 12×
- Family Finance Corp. v. GaffneySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-03-02· cited 12×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1934-03-05· cited 1,848×
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court· 1934-12-03· cited 390×
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court· 1937-11-24· cited 147×
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-02-28· cited 142×
- Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court· 1911-01-03· cited 140×
- La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court· 1919-01-27· cited 92×
- Jackson v. ShawlCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 32×
- Tennessee Finance Co. v. ThompsonSixth Circuit· 1922-02-07· cited 23×
- Ex parte LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-08-22· cited 13×
- In re BickerstaffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-06-23· cited 11×
- Willson v. FisherNew York County Courts· 1912-01-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.