Hooper v. California
Citations
- 155 U.S. 648
- 15 S. Ct. 207
- 39 L. Ed. 297
- 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2113
Syllabus
<p>Section 439 of the Penal Code of California, making it a misdemeanor for a person in that State to procure insurance for a resident in the State from an insurance company not incorporated under its laws and which had not filed the bond required by the laws of the State relative to insurance, is not a regulation of commerce, and does not couflict with the Constitution of the United States, when enforced against the agent of a New York firm in California who, through his principals and by telegram, procured fora resident in California applying for it there, marine insurance on an ocean steamer, from an insurance company incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts, and which had not filed the bond required by the laws of California.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming criminal conviction by declin‐ ing to read state statute as having extraterritorial applica‐ tion
- stating \elementary rule\ that court must construe statutes reasonably to uphold their constitutionality
- affirming criminal conviction by declining to read state statute as having extraterritorial application
- “The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.” (emphasis added)
- “The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.” (emphasis added)
- “The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Harlan, Brewer, Jackson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
303 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 3,788×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court· 2019-06-24· cited 2,472×
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 1,298×
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 1,067×
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-11-29· cited 1,064×
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 1,025×
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court· 1944-06-05· cited 861×
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 824×
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 755×
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court· 1955-04-11· cited 605×
- Miller v. FrenchSupreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 593×
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 582×
- Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 529×
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 490×
- In re SandersMichigan Supreme Court· 2014-06-02· cited 469×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1869-11-18· cited 857×
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court· 1830-02-18· cited 609×
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court· 1876-04-17· cited 589×
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court· 1887-03-07· cited 570×
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1888-04-09· cited 387×
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court· 1856-04-25· cited 348×
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1885-03-30· cited 339×
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1891-05-25· cited 324×
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 283×
- Stoutenburgh v. HennickSupreme Court· 1889-01-14· cited 157×
- McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 139×
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court· 1888-10-29· cited 134×
- United States v. CoombsSupreme Court· 1838-01-27· cited 109×
- Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court· 1884-11-17· cited 107×
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 94×
- Ducat v. ChicagoSupreme Court· 1871-01-18· cited 85×
- Ashley v. RyanSupreme Court· 1894-05-14· cited 65×
- Monitor Mutual Fire Insurance v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1873-03-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.