Kyte v. Philip Morris Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• aiding and abetting require proof that the defendant knew of its substantial, supporting role in an unlawful enterprise
• aiding and abetting require proof that the defendant knew of its substantial, supporting role in an unlawful enterprise
• denying defendant’s summary judgment motion inasmuch as plaintiffs’ design defect “claim [was] not based on the proposition that all cigarettes are inherently defective”
• allowing product liability claim to go forward because it alleged that defendant’s cigarettes were particularly carcinogenic and addictive without alleging that all cigarettes were inherently defective
• allowing product liability claim to go forward because it alleged that defendant’s cigarettes were particularly carcinogenic and addictive without alleging that ah cigarettes were inherently defective
• characterizing a civil conspiracy claim based on substantial assistance as an “aiding and abetting theory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).