D. Massachusetts· 10/16/2012
Blake v. Professional Coin Grading Service
Citations
- 898 F. Supp. 2d 365
- 2012 WL 4903334
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a plaintiff’s allegations of “business chicanery” do not state a claim under Mass. Gen. L. c. 266, §91 because the plaintiff fails to allege a false or misleading statement
- “This Court has consistently held that a plaintiff is not entitled to recover for conversion of intangible property.”
- “[Plaintiff’s] claim in this regard fails to state that the benefit was ‘conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff.’” (citation omitted)
- \a plaintiff is not entitled to recover for conversion of intangible property\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationS.D. New York· 2017-06-30· cited 72×
- Allstate Insurance Company v. FougereFirst Circuit· 2023-08-29· cited 29×
- J & J Sports Productions Inc. v. CelaD. Massachusetts· 2015-10-09· cited 17×
- Brockton Power LLC v. City of BrocktonD. Massachusetts· 2013-05-30· cited 14×
- Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. Orgill, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2015-07-29· cited 12×
- Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District of Columbia· 2018-07-24· cited 10×
- Financial Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2013-03-14· cited 1×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,423×
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 612×
- Maldonado v. FontanesFirst Circuit· 2009-06-04· cited 559×
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 551×
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.First Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 495×
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court· 2003-06-02· cited 486×
- Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawFirst Circuit· 2004-11-10· cited 456×
- Garita Hotel Limited Partnership, Etc. v. Ponce Federal Bank, F.S.B.First Circuit· 1992-03-05· cited 358×
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedFirst Circuit· 2001-12-17· cited 309×
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co.Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 208×
- Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-01-22· cited 195×
- Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.First Circuit· 2009-01-12· cited 158×
- Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-05-22· cited 152×
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Kenneth G. WheelerFirst Circuit· 1987-03-26· cited 145×
- Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-03-25· cited 137×
- Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilFirst Circuit· 2009-08-03· cited 132×
- Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-02· cited 118×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.