Kulhawik v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statements in a brief do not constitute evidence
• “An attorney’s unsworn statements in a brief are not evidence.” (citing Phinpathya)
• “an attorney's unsworn 13 ||statements in a brief are not evidence”
• “An attorney’s unsworn statements in a brief are not evidence.”
• “[a]n attorney’s unsworn statements in a brief are not evidence.”
• An attorney’s unsworn statements in a brief are not evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).