Second Circuit· 2/26/2021
Zelaya-Moreno v. Wilkinson
Citations
- 989 F.3d 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that opposition to gangs does not constitute a political opinion absent evidence of a “disagreement with the policies they seek to impose []or any ideology they espouse”
- holding that absent “particularized evidence” a petitioner’s “generalized statements about the pervasiveness of gangs and gang violence” did not show error in BIA’s conclusion regarding the likelihood of torture
- holding that absent “particularized evidence” a petitioner’s “generalized statements about the pervasiveness of gangs and gang violence” did not show error in BIA’s conclusion 8 regarding the likelihood of torture
- concluding that telling a group “that they are ‘bad’ . . . is insufficient to establish that [petitioner’s] resistance . . . took on a political dimension by transcending mere self-protection” (quotation marks omitted)
- explaining that “disapproving of things that have a negative impact on one’s life or even one’s country does not necessarily amount to a political opinion”
- noting that a political belief can be “imputed to [the applicant] by the persecutor”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Quituizaca v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2022-11-01· cited 145×
- Garcia-Aranda v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2022-11-21· cited 73×
- Chavez v. GarlandFirst Circuit· 2022-10-21· cited 21×
- Emmanuel Deng Chol v. Merrick B. GarlandEighth Circuit· 2022-02-16· cited 5×
- D-G-E-A- & N-G-G-EBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2026-04-21· cited 1×
- Lopez Martinez v. BlancheFirst Circuit· 2026-04-23
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-12-07· cited 2,764×
- Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1Second Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 2,703×
- Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 2005-10-13· cited 2,667×
- Parastoo Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceThird Circuit· 1993-12-20· cited 796×
- Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2013-02-13· cited 591×
- Santos-Lemus v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-09-08· cited 591×
- Marta Brigida Melgar De Torres v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, and the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 1999-08-19· cited 581×
- Mu Xiang Lin v. United States Department of JusticeSecond Circuit· 2005-11-22· cited 571×
- Parussimova v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2009-01-26· cited 543×
- Sameh Sami S. Khouzam, A/K/A Sameh Sami Khouzam, A/K/A Sameh S. Khouzam, A/K/A Sameh Khouzam v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSecond Circuit· 2004-04-12· cited 518×
- Vicente Osorio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, Amicus CuriaeSecond Circuit· 1994-03-07· cited 346×
- Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 327×
- Mu-Xing Wang v. AshcroftSecond Circuit· 2003-02-06· cited 324×
- Oscar Kayembe v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2003-07-01· cited 287×
- Viktor Yaroslavovich Sagaydak Nataliya Bogdanivna Sagaydak v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-05-04· cited 287×
- Kyaw Zwar Tun v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSecond Circuit· 2006-04-21· cited 263×
- Ramos-Lopez v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-04-16· cited 177×
- Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2011-11-08· cited 176×
- Jose Joaquin-Porras v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesSecond Circuit· 2006-01-18· cited 156×
- Nune Mamouzian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-12-09· cited 145×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.