Debeatham v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 14 petitioner had to show “that the outcome of his removal 15 proceedings would have been . . . different” but for the 16 alleged due process violation
• concluding that petitioner failed to demonstrate prejudice when he had “not shown that the outcome of his removal proceedings would have been any different” absent the alleged deficient performance of counsel
• finding no prejudice where “petitioner ha[d] not shown that the outcome of [the] removal proceedings would have been any different”
• requiring showing that “outcome of . . . removal proceedings would have been . . . different”
• finding no prejudice where “even if [former counsel] had presented all of the evidence and made all of the arguments that petitioner now claims he should have, petitioner has not shown that the outcome of his removal proceedings would have been any different”
• “[A]n alien claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must also show prejudice resulting from counsel’s alleged deficiencies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).