Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/23/2010

Kuck v. Danaher

Citations

  • 600 F.3d 159
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5899
  • 2010 WL 1039273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Privileges must be addressed on a document-by-document and question-by-question basis. United States v. Lawless
  • noting that a retaliation claim requires “a causal connection between the adverse action and the protected speech”
  • recognizing, in the firearms licensing context, “that administrative determinations may require a non-trivial amount of time to complete”
  • recognizing, in the firearms licensing context, “that administrative determinations may require a non-trivial amount of time to complete”
  • finding that the strict enforcement of laws did not constitute adverse action
  • affirming Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of substantive due process claim because the deprivation alleged did not meet the “shock the contemporary conscience” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Straub, Parker, Livingston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kuck v. Danaher

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.