Ezagui v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting statements which a nonmovant does “not specifically deny–with citations to supporting evidence–are deemed admitted for purposes of [movant’s] summary judgment motion”
• deeming and Paul Engola as secondary beneficiaries to the Alliance statements in party's 56.1 statement admitted where opposing Account. (Id.
• “[A]ny of the Plaintiff’s Rule 56.1 Statements that Defendants do not specifically deny—with citations to supporting evidence—are deemed admitted for purposes of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).