· 6/30/1992
Arochem International, Inc., Arochem Corporation and William R. Harris v. Harold W. Buirkle
Citations
- 968 F.2d 266
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14996
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying California law to a judicial-proceeding privilege which was conduct-regulating and California had a strong interest in its law governing
- “As noted, the California rule of privilege regulates conduct and, even assuming that injuries suffered by Harris and AroChem occurred in Connecticut, California’s interests prevail.”
- defamation and tortious interference with contractual and commercial relationship claims
- table and analysis of Neumeier rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Winter, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.