Skip to main content
· 6/30/1992

Arochem International, Inc., Arochem Corporation and William R. Harris v. Harold W. Buirkle

Citations

  • 968 F.2d 266
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying California law to a judicial-proceeding privilege which was conduct-regulating and California had a strong interest in its law governing
  • “As noted, the California rule of privilege regulates conduct and, even assuming that injuries suffered by Harris and AroChem occurred in Connecticut, California’s interests prevail.”
  • defamation and tortious interference with contractual and commercial relationship claims
  • table and analysis of Neumeier rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Winter, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.