Douglas E. Wall v. Csx Transportation, Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation, Docket No. 05-4065-Cv

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “fraud claim may not be used as a means of restating what is, in substance, a claim for breach of contract”
• denying a motion to dismiss a fraud claim where the challenged misrepresentation was not explicitly captured in the contract terms
• listing elements of fraudulent inducement as: (1) material false representation collateral to a contract; (2) known by defendant to be false; (3) reasonable reliance by plaintiff N.E.2d 1104, 1108 (N.Y. 2011) (listing elements of fraudulent misrepresentation as: (1
• \New York law specifically recognizes causes of action for fraud in the inducement when the misrepresentation is collateral to the contract it induced.\
• “New York law specifically recognizes causes of action for fraud in the inducement when the misrepresentation is collateral to the contract it induced.”
• “As there is no conflict . . . New York, as the forum state, would apply its law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).