Beatie and Osborn LLP v. Patriot Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “random,” “fortuitous,” or “attenuated” contacts do not support § 302(a)(1) jurisdiction
• “Section 5– 1402 is not a limitation on the use and effectiveness of forum selection clauses.” (citation omitted)
• “The convenience of the forum for witnesses is probably considered the single most important factor in the analysis of whether a transfer should be granted.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “The Second Circuit has made clear that district courts should be wary when deciding whether to grant a Rule 12(f) motion on the ground that the matter is impertinent and immaterial.”’
• “The Second Circuit has made clear that district courts should be wary when deciding whether to grant a Rule 12(f) motion on the ground that the matter is impertinent and immaterial.”
• “The Second Circuit has made clear that district courts should be wary when deciding whether to grant a Rule 12(f) motion on the ground that the matter is impertinent and immaterial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).