Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting counsel’s failure to keep the district court clerk’s office advised of numerous address changes in considering the totality of counsel’suonduct
• applying Rule 6(a)(2) to exclude intermediate weekends and holidays in calculating the deadline to file a post-trial motion
• \The unique circumstances doctrine has never been extended to an attorney's miscalculation of the applicable time limits.\
• “The unique circumstances doctrine has never been extended to an attorney’s miscalculation of the applicable time limits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Schneider v. Fried
  Third Circuit· 2003-02-18· cited 366×
• United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and Accessories
  Third Circuit· 2000-01-07· cited 132×
• John Varhol v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, D/B/A Amtrak
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-08-13· cited 108×
• Frederick Feinstein v. Morris and Joyce Moses, D/B/A Sun-Cal Products
  First Circuit· 1991-12-12· cited 102×
• Clifton E. Spencer v. Ernest Sutton
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-02-07· cited 93×
• Mr. Jesse Pinion, Mrs. Jesse Pinion, Maurice Daffron, Shirley Daffron v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-04-19· cited 76×
• Lisa Panhorst Joanne Jones John M. Jones v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-02-20· cited 61×
• Energy Mgt. P 26,666 United States of America v. Glenn Martin Heller, D/B/A Beacon Hill Gulf
  First Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 60×
• Quick v. Peoples Bank
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-06-21· cited 32×
• Roland Collard, and Mark Oakes, Bruce Oakes, Russell Parks, and Dale Larson v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-11-23· cited 29×
• Rhoden v. Campbell
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-08-14· cited 23×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1993-06-21· cited 22×
• Jackson v. Crosby
  Eleventh Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 21×
• Alston v. MCI Communications Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 1996-05-28· cited 20×
• Home & Family, Inc. v. England Resources Corp. (In Re Home & Family, Inc.)
  Tenth Circuit· 1996-06-03· cited 15×
• Richard L. Fogel, Cross-Appellee v. Gordon & Glickson, P.C.
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-12-29· cited 7×
• Proteon Inc. v. Memorex Telex Corp. (In Re Memorex Telex Corp.)
  D. Delaware· 1999-11-26· cited 4×
• United States v. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-12-20· cited 3×
• Robert W. Kearns v. Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Toyo Kogyo (Mazda), and Fuji (Subaru), Defendants/cross-Appellants
  Federal Circuit· 1995-02-15· cited 1×
• United States v. Schooner Windspirit
  Virgin Islands· 1995-04-18· cited 1×

Other cases named Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-08-28· cited 25×