Skip to main content
· 1/7/2000

United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and Accessories

Citations

  • 200 F.3d 203
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 371
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 350
  • 2000 WL 15007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a sua sponte judicial reduction of a fee request is appropriate where predicated on a legal as opposed to a factual challenge
  • stating that a sua sponte judicial reduction of a fee request is appropriate where predicated on a legal as opposed to a factual challenge
  • noting that “this prohibition on sua sponte reduction of fees applies only to challenges to the excessiveness of a fee request”
  • reviewing a District Court’s departure from its own local rules on direct appeal from a final order
  • upholding a district court’s decision to award supplemental fees when the supplemental motion was filed three months after the initial fees award
  • involving an untimely filed memorandum in opposition to a supplemental request for fees and expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.