Alston v. MCI Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \It is clear ... that the district court was without power to enlarge the time period for filing a Rule 59(e) motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lisa Panhorst Joanne Jones John M. Jones v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-02-20· cited 61×
• Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. Datanet Engineering, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-05-26· cited 48×
• United States v. Kirk Marsh
  Fourth Circuit· 2019-12-09· cited 17×
• Overland, Inc. v. Nance
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-05-23· cited 7×
• Spencer Medical Associates. v. Commissioner
  Fourth Circuit· 1998-07-22· cited 3×
• Alston v. Mci Communications
  Fourth Circuit· 1996-05-28
• Spencer Medical Associates v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
  Fourth Circuit· 1998-07-22
• Unnamed case
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-05-26
• Panhorst v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-02-20
• United States v. Lynch
  Fourth Circuit· 2005-11-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 3,383×
• United States v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 2,015×
• Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 775×
• Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Supreme Court· 1964-01-06· cited 403×
• Mr. Jesse Pinion, Mrs. Jesse Pinion, Maurice Daffron, Shirley Daffron v. Dow Chemical, U.S.A.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-04-19· cited 76×
• Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  Third Circuit· 1990-04-06· cited 39×
• Jerry Lewis Myers v. Linwood v. Stephenson Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Rufus L. Edmisten
  Fourth Circuit· 1984-11-05· cited 33×
• Dow Chemical, U. S. A. v. Pinion
  Supreme Court· 1991-11-18· cited 31×