Schneider v. Fried

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court lacks jurisdiction to grant untimely Rule 59 motion
• holding [ ] that trial court erred by excluding cardiologist expert who had stopped performing angio- plasties but continued to advise interventional cardiologists who performed angioplasties
• explaining that invasive cardiologist’s academic background, teaching position, and prior experience advising interventional cardiologists demonstrated that he could provide opinion about cardiology, no matter the sub-specialty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).