Kramer v. Kramer

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4865

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in establishing a de facto date of marriage termination prior to the date of the final hearing where the evidence supported the trial court's finding there had been a clear and bilateral breakdown of the marriage. The evidence supports the trial court's finding that a sale of the marital residence was required in order to facilitate an equitable property division. However, the trial court abused its discretion by failing to assign value to the marital residence as of the de facto date of marriage termination and when it used appellant's gross income in calculating his spousal support obligation. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded for a proper valuation of the marital residence and redetermination of spousal support.