Moon v. Moon

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 2428

Syllabus

In this divorce case, we find the trial court erred in effectively requiring appellant to finance appellee's retention of the marital residence. The trial court also erred, as part of its division and allocation of marital assets and liabilities, in not considering the interest on credit cards arising from his purchases on those cards after the de facto termination date of the marriage. The trial court did not err, however, in directing the parties to sell the timeshare purchased during the marriage. Judgment affirmed in part, and reversed in part cause remanded.