Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/7/2024
Miller v. Miller
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 821
Syllabus
Judgment reversed. The trial court erred by sustaining an objection which was never made and by rendering judgment without considering all the evidence. Because appellant's income decreased significantly in the year prior to trial, the court erred by failing to explain why it refused to reserve jurisdiction to modify the spousal support award.
Judges: Leland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-11· cited 1,496×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- Kunkle v. KunkleOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 595×
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court· 1991-03-13· cited 300×
- Middendorf v. MiddendorfOhio Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 277×
- State v. ChinnOhio Supreme Court· 1999-06-02· cited 115×
- Huelskamp v. HuelskampOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-28· cited 44×
- Stanley v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-21· cited 44×
- Ressler v. ResslerOhio Supreme Court· 1985-04-24· cited 44×
- Kramer v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-26· cited 9×
- Rigby v. RigbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-01· cited 9×
- Higgins v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-05· cited 4×
- Miller v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-28· cited 4×
- Poe v. PoeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.