Sixth Circuit· 2/3/2010

Koubriti v. Convertino

Citations

593 F.3d 459
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2283
2010 WL 364188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a prosecutor was entitled to absolute immunity for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence, even if it was intentional
holding that it is improper to reach the merits of questions not developed in the lower court record or briefed by the parties
stating that functions which “serve as an ‘integral part of the judicial process’ or that are ‘intimately associated with the judicial process’ are absolutely immune from civil suits”
stating that functions which “serve as an ‘integral part of the judicial process’ or that are ‘intimately associated with the judicial process’ are absolutely immune from civil suits”
holding prosecutor’s recommendation to police officer that he need not disclose certain evidence to defendant was not “legal advice” but rather part of decisions for which the prosecutor was entitled to prosecutorial immunity
noting that prosecutorial immunity applies to knowingly using false testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Rogers, Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Koubriti v. Convertino

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.