Joe D'Ambrosio v. Carmen Marino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three prior instances of one prosecutor engaging misconduct were insufficient to provide notice
• holding that a county’s knowledge of only three prior instances could not establish notice of habitually unconstitutional conduct in support of a failure- to-train claim
• holding that three prior instances of unconstitutional conduct were insufficient to establish a pattern that would show deliberate indifference by the municipality
• recognizing that a county’s knowledge of only three prior instances of constitutional violations by its prosecutors could not establish notice of habitually unconstitutional conduct in support of a failure-to-train claim
• recognizing that a county’s knowledge of only three prior instances of constitutional violations by its prosecutors could not establish notice of habitually unconstitutional conduct in support of a failure-to- train claim
• recognizing three prior instances could not establish notice of habitually unconstitutional conduct to support a failure to train claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).