Skip to main content
· 11/14/2007

Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance

Citations

  • 508 F.3d 327
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court may consider documents referenced in the pleadings that are \integral to the claims\ in deciding motion to dismiss
  • holding that a district court may consider documents referenced in the pleadings that are \integral to the claims\ in deciding motion to dismiss
  • holding that a district court may consider documents referenced in the pleadings that are “integral to the claims” in deciding a motion to dismiss
  • explaining that courts may consider documents \referred to in the pleadings\ and \integral to the claims ... without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment\
  • explaining that courts may consider documents “referred to in the pleadings” and “integral to No. 17-1380 Fulton v. Enclarity, Inc. Page 10 the claims . . . without converting a motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment”
  • court may consider documents referenced in the pleadings that are \integral to the claims\ in deciding motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, Rogers, McKeague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.