Susan Stricker v. Twp. Of Cambridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of a 9-1-1 call soliciting response from an emergency team weighs in favor of finding that a defendant had a diminished expectation of privacy in his home
• holding officers did not violate Fourth Amendment where members of household \repeatedly disobeyed lawful officer commands\ and officers' use of force was not \gratuitously violent\
• holding that officers’ search around bedrooms and into drawers and cabinets was “objectively reasonable” because it was “consistent with a search for clues as to what [the overdose victim] ingested, in order to aid EMS in its treatment of [him]”
• holding show of force, including pointing a taser, did not violate the Fourth Amendment in part because the plaintiff had “repeatedly disobeyed lawful officer commands”
• sustaining the warrantless search of home, including drawers and cabinets, where drug overdose of occupant had been reported and such search might yield clues as to what occupant had ingested
• sustaining the warrantless search of home, including drawers and cabinets, where drug overdose of occupant had been reported and such search might yield clues as to what occupant had ingested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).