S.D. New York· 10/24/1986
Korwek v. Hunt
Citations
- 646 F. Supp. 953
- 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 766
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18580
Judges: Lasker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1993-02-11· cited 108×
- Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1993-09-24· cited 79×
- Dietrich v. BauerS.D. New York· 1999-03-04· cited 62×
- Korwek v. HuntSecond Circuit· 1987-08-26· cited 53×
- In Re Chaus Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1992-09-01· cited 45×
- Korwek v. HuntS.D. New York· 1986-12-30· cited 34×
- Moll v. US Life Title Ins. Co. of New YorkS.D. New York· 1987-02-17· cited 30×
- Blankman v. County of NassauE.D. New York· 1993-04-21· cited 30×
- In Re General Development Corp. Bond LitigationS.D. New York· 1992-07-08· cited 24×
- Cerasani v. Sony Corp.S.D. New York· 1998-01-15· cited 22×
- Clement v. United Homes, LLCE.D. New York· 2012-12-27· cited 21×
- McMahan & Co. v. Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc.S.D. New York· 1994-08-10· cited 19×
- DGM Investments, Inc. v. New York Futures Exchange, Inc.S.D. New York· 2003-10-23· cited 14×
- Pomeroy v. Schlegel Corp.W.D. New York· 1991-12-19· cited 10×
- Zola v. GordonS.D. New York· 1988-12-06· cited 10×
- Michelson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.S.D. New York· 1987-09-02· cited 7×
- CAMOTEX, SRL v. HuntS.D. New York· 1990-07-09· cited 6×
- In Re Sterling Foster & Co., Inc. Securities Lit.E.D. New York· 2002-06-27· cited 6×
- Weiss v. La Suisse, Societe D'Assurances Sur La VieS.D. New York· 2005-08-10· cited 5×
- Harrison v. Northwest Orient Airlines, Inc.S.D. New York· 1987-10-26· cited 2×
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 4,134×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 1,545×
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationSecond Circuit· 1974-03-13· cited 1,333×
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,036×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 986×
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 759×
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 526×
- Armstrong v. McAlpinSecond Circuit· 1983-01-24· cited 272×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.First Circuit· 1978-03-28· cited 253×
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1980-08-05· cited 232×
- SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantThird Circuit· 1981-06-05· cited 225×
- Ladmer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 181×
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,586, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,632 Joseph A. Carothers v. W. Thomas RiceSixth Circuit· 1980-10-23· cited 172×
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,223, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,220 Berry Petroleum Company, an Arkansas Corp. (Dissolved) v. Adams & PeckSecond Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 148×
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1986-08-14· cited 139×
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AlcornSupreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 138×
- Barbara B. Sack v. V. T. Low, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name of Bear, Stearns & Co., and Richard W. SilvermanSecond Circuit· 1973-04-13· cited 134×
- Leist v. SimplotSecond Circuit· 1980-07-08· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.