Skip to main content
· 3/4/1999

Dietrich v. Bauer

Citations

  • 76 F. Supp. 2d 312
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2637
  • 1999 WL 126438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing complaint for failing to allege injuries arising out of investment of proceeds of illegal acts, rather than from acts themselves
  • “[A]n alleged fraud cannot be in connection with the purchase or sale of a security if the transaction occurs prior to the fraud.”
  • \ Rule 9(b) is not satisfied by a complaint in which defendants are clumped together in vague allegations.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “Rule 9(b) is not satisfied by a complaint in which defendants are clumped together in vague allegations.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[A] party may not advance new facts, issues or arguments not previously presented to the court.”
  • “Matters suggested in [plaintiff’s] opposing papers that interpret allegations in the Amended Complaint broadly or facts that are offered but that do not appear in the Amended Complaint will not be considered [on a 12(b)(6) motion].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.