Korwek v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the tolling doctrine enunciated in American Pipe does not apply to permit a plaintiff to file a subsequent class action following a definitive determination of the inappropriateness of class certification.”
• “The Supreme Court in American Pipe and Crown, Cork certainly did not intend to afford plaintiffs the opportunity to argue and reargue the question of class certification by filing new but repetitive complaints.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 476×
• Joseph v. Wiles
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 153×
• Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. Partnership
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-01-03· cited 106×
• Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
  S.D. New York· 1989-06-06· cited 92×
• In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2002-12-27· cited 86×
• In Re Enron Corp. Securities
  S.D. Texas· 2006-06-05· cited 55×
• Public Employees' Retirement System v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-22· cited 51×
• Giovanniello v. ALM Media, LLC
  Second Circuit· 2013-08-08· cited 46×
• Yang v. Odom
  Third Circuit· 2004-12-15· cited 46×
• McKowan Lowe & Co. v. Jasmine, Ltd.
  Third Circuit· 2002-07-17· cited 33×
• In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
  E.D. New York· 1990-09-19· cited 29×
• Phillips v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1996-07-02· cited 26×
• McBean v. City of New York
  S.D. New York· 2009-08-14· cited 24×
• Vincent v. Money Store
  S.D. New York· 2015-02-02· cited 21×
• Cheryl Phipps v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2015-07-07· cited 17×
• In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
  E.D. New York· 1992-09-04· cited 15×
• Bridges v. Department of Maryland State Police
  Fourth Circuit· 2006-03-20· cited 14×
• In Re Vertrue Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
  N.D. Ohio· 2010-04-16· cited 13×
• Smith v. Texaco, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2000-03-07· cited 13×
• Catholic Social Services, Inc. v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-11-21· cited 10×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 2,370×
• American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
• Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
• Cullen v. Margiotta
  Second Circuit· 1987-02-02· cited 352×
• Amado Salazar-Calderon, Cross-Appellees v. Presidio Valley Farmers Association, Cross
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-07-25· cited 127×
• Bellissimo v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1986-02-24· cited 98×
• Korwek v. Hunt
  Second Circuit· 1987-08-26· cited 73×
• Smith v. Flagship International
  N.D. Texas· 1985-01-22· cited 30×
• Korwek v. Hunt
  S.D. New York· 1986-10-24· cited 26×
• Burns v. Ersek
  D. Minnesota· 1984-05-08· cited 26×
• Andrews v. Orr
  S.D. Ohio· 1985-06-14· cited 12×
• Brooks v. Flagg Bros.
  Second Circuit· 1977-04-07· cited 6×
• Rhoades v. Jim Dandy Co.
  N.D. Alabama· 1985-07-11· cited 3×