Skip to main content
D. New Jersey· 6/30/2014

Korrow v. Aaron's, Inc.

Citations

  • 300 F.R.D. 215
  • 2014 WL 3040802
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A determination of ‘good cause’ under Rule 16 depends on the diligence of the moving party.”
  • “Only once the party has shown sufficient ‘good cause’ to amend the Rule 16 Order to extend the deadline will the [c]ourt evaluate the proposed amendment under Rule 15(a).”
  • “Only once the party has shown sufficient ‘good cause’ to amend the Rule 16 Order to extend the deadline will the Court evaluate the proposed amendment under Rule 15(a)”
  • “[T]he First, Second, and Seventh Circuit • Courts of Appeals have concluded that the compulsory/permissive distinction of Rule 13 was superseded by the enactment of 28 U.S.C. § 1367 in 1990”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.