Hudson United Bank v. Litenda Mortgage Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, through § 1447(d), “Congress has fashioned an exception to the general 3 rule of review, and made a district court’s initial determination that removal was inappropriate a nonreviewable one”
• confirming appellate jurisdiction to review order dismissing federal claims against one defendant and remanding remaining claims against second defendant to state court
• mailing of a remand order did not divest district court of jurisdiction to consider a motion for reconsideration after it remanded pursuant to § 1367(c)
• “[J]urisdiction that is originally and properly vested in the district court becomes vested in the court of appeals when a notice of appeal is filed.”
• “[Jjurisdiction that is originally and properly vested in the district court becomes vested in the court of appeals when a notice of appeal is filed.”
• “[J]urisdiction that is originally and properly vested in the district court becomes vested in the court of appeals when a notice of appeal is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).