De Asencio v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining circumstances under which courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over pendent state-law claims
• following Weldon in observing that, while the WPCL provides a remedy, entitlement to compensation must, at a minimum, flow from an implied oral contract, in the absence of a formal agreement
• “It has consistently been recognized that pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right.”
• “Our inquiry here centers on the terms of proof and the scope of the issues raised . . . .”
• “It has consistently been recognized that pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right.”
• “It has consistently been recognized that pendent jurisdiction is a doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff's right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).