Koch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we do not develop a party's argument if the party has not endeavored to do so
• “[T]he appropriate inquiry regarding prejudice in this case is whether petitioner has proved that, but for counsel’s advice, he would not have agreed to a stipulated-facts trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lotches v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-10· cited 5×
• Byers v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-13· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Krummacher v. Gierloff
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 232×
• Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-13· cited 196×
• Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-08· cited 171×
• Trujillo v. Maass
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 164×
• Stevens v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-09-28· cited 113×
• Horn v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-13· cited 25×
• Rodriguez-Moreno v. State of Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 11×
• State v. Radford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-29· cited 7×
• Long v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-07· cited 7×
• Castro v. Maass
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-07· cited 4×
• Bickford v. Bachik
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 3×
• Tatarinov v. Belleque
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 1×