Long v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing the petitioner’s agreement to a stipulated-facts trial as a plea agreement and explaining that the appropriate prejudice inquiry was whether the petitioner “would not have entered into the plea agreement” but for counsel’s erroneous advice
• “Failure to inform a defendant of certain consequences of a criminal plea may also constitute inadequate assistance of counsel.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gonzalez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-28· cited 13×
• State v. Cach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 9×
• Stroup v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-15· cited 9×
• Saroian v. State of Oregon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-05-27· cited 6×
• Sanders v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 4×
• Koch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-10· cited 3×