Koch v. Schapiro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there is no cause of action for improper handling of a complaint by the EEO office of a federal agency, which provides a function analogous to the EEOC
• observing that “[t]he ninety-day time limit” in 29 C.F.R § 1614.407(c) “functions like a statute of limitations”
• finding that a complainant may not sue the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for improper handling of a discrimination charge and dismissing similar allegations against another agency
• finding that a complainant may not sue the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for improper handling of a discrimination charge and dismissing similar allegations against another agency
• “The D.C. Circuit’s analysis [in Smith] is equally applicable to allegations of improper handling of a complaint by the EEO office of a federal agency, which provides a function analogous to the EEOC.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Proctor v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2014-11-25· cited 32×
• Braun v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-02-13· cited 22×
• Etokie v. Duncan
  District of Columbia· 2016-07-29· cited 14×
• Coulibaly v. Pompeo
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 13×
• Koch v. White
  District of Columbia· 2015-09-29· cited 10×
• Richardson v. Sauls
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-06-18· cited 6×
• Gibbs v. Department of the Interior
  District of Columbia· 2014-04-21· cited 3×
• Ridley v. Dynamic Vision Home Health Services
  District of Columbia· 2014-09-18· cited 1×
• Donovan v. Powell
  District of Columbia· 2014-10-02· cited 1×
• Koch v. Schapiro
  District of Columbia· 2014-06-11
• Santos v. Lynch
  District of Columbia· 2016-07-20
• Braun v. U.S. Department of the Interior
  District of Columbia· 2018-02-13
• Richardson v. Sauls
  District of Columbia· 2018-06-18
• Coulibaly v. Kerry
  District of Columbia· 2018-07-17
• Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
  District of Columbia· 2021-03-31
• Lynn v. Altarum Institute
  District of Columbia· 2023-06-26
• Rupard v. Mayorkas
  District of Columbia· 2023-08-31
• Abeywardene v. Dejoy
  District of Columbia· 2025-05-13
• Thomas v. Power
  District of Columbia· 2026-03-25

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Haines v. Kerner
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
• Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
• Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
• Brown v. General Services Administration
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 1,934×
• Bush v. Lucas
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,430×
• Wilkie v. Robbins
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-25· cited 682×
• James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, Mayor
  D.C. Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 636×
• Hettinga v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 2012-04-13· cited 588×
• Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 314×
• Thomas C. Fox v. Marion D. Strickland
  D.C. Circuit· 1988-01-22· cited 297×
• Payne v. Salazar
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-09-07· cited 220×
• Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 217×
• Pamela J. Jordan v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-02-29· cited 178×
• Elkins v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 2012-08-10· cited 100×
• Michael Smith v. Gilbert F. Casellas, Chairman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-09-02· cited 77×
• Laughlin v. Holder
  District of Columbia· 2013-02-14· cited 77×
• Wiley v. Johnson
  District of Columbia· 2006-07-06· cited 67×