Skip to main content
· 1/22/1988

Thomas C. Fox v. Marion D. Strickland

Citations

  • 837 F.2d 507
  • 267 U.S. App. D.C. 84
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 583
  • 1988 WL 3046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district courts must advise pro se plaintiffs of the consequences of failing to respond to a dispositive motion
  • holding that district courts must advise pro se plaintiffs of the consequences of failing to respond to a dispositive motion
  • holding that district courts must advise pro se plaintiffs of the consequences of failing to respond to a dispositive motion
  • stating that the court must take pains to advise a pro se party that failing to respond to a dispositive motion “may result in the district court granting the motion and dismissing the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Starr, Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.