Koch v. Hankins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “even if a general partner vigorously exercised his or her rights under the partnership agreement, he or she arguably could have no impact on the investment”
• holding manager was irreplaceable where investors had no practical ability to replace him
• although individuals investing in large-scale jojoba farm could technically replace their farm manager, it would not have been economical to do so
• reversing a grant of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holden v. Hagopian
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-11-02· cited 97×
• Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. Pardo
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-07-05· cited 72×
• De Wit v. Firstar Corp.
  N.D. Iowa· 1995-03-01· cited 50×
• Ito International Corp. v. Prescott, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-26· cited 23×
• Nutek Information Systems, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-10· cited 22×
• Koch v. Hankins
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-03-21· cited 18×
• Stewart v. Ragland
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-08-30· cited 16×
• Koch v. Hankins
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-15· cited 13×
• Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Schewe
  N.D. Iowa· 1998-05-25· cited 12×
• Ussec v. E. Andrew Schooler
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-09-26· cited 10×
• Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney
  D. Nevada· 2012-01-23· cited 10×
• Vasquez v. City of Miami Beach
  S.D. Florida· 2012-10-03· cited 6×
• Tschetter v. Berven
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-01-17· cited 5×
• Rome v. HEI Res., Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 3×
• Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1994-01-26· cited 3×
• Baroi v. Platinum Condominium Development, LLC
  D. Nevada· 2012-07-11· cited 1×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Sethi Petroleum, LLC
  E.D. Texas· 2017-01-17