Koch v. Hankins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where record wasn’t fully developed it “simply [had] no basis for evaluating the sophistication of many of the investors”
• looking to the \practical possibility of the investors exercising the powers they possessed pursuant to the partnership agreements.\
• looking to the \practical possibility of the investors exercising the powers they possessed pursuant to the partnership agreements.\
• looking to the \practical possibility of the investors exercising the powers they possessed pursuant to the partnership agreements.\
• “While it is undisputed that none of the investors had prior experience in jojoba 31 farming, that draws the question too narrowly.”
• We therefore ... apply all three Williamson factors in evaluating whether the investors expected profits produced by the efforts of others so as to satisfy the third element of Howey”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Shields
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-02-24· cited 213×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Merchant Capital, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2007-04-04· cited 104×
• Nokia Corp. v. InterDigital, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2011-05-23· cited 43×
• Koch v. Hankins
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-15· cited 34×
• SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Arcturus Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-01-07· cited 31×
• SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Arcturus Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-06-27· cited 16×
• Holden v. Hagopian
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-11-02· cited 13×
• Koshiro Kitazato v. Black Diamond Hospitality Investments, LLC
  D. Hawaii· 2009-07-29· cited 3×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alliance Leasing Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-03· cited 3×
• Schaffer Family Investors, LLC v. Sonnier
  C.D. California· 2015-08-13· cited 3×
• Hogan v. Runyon
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-07-20· cited 2×
• Chan v. HEI Resources
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-06-04· cited 1×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-Cross
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-05-20· cited 1,640×
• Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.
  Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 1,616×
• United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman
  Supreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 908×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 680×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-02-01· cited 399×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,494 Great Western Bank & Trust v. Sol Kotz
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-03-22· cited 137×
• Al K. Plotkin, and Gerald Kilgore, Individually and Dba Jk Sports Journal v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-09-29· cited 117×
• J. Donald GOODWIN, Appellant, v. ELKINS & CO., Robert G. Hayden, Richard Sichenzio, and Gabriel F. Nagy, Appellees
  Third Circuit· 1984-03-14· cited 117×
• Gerald M. Hocking v. Maylee Dubois and Vitousek & Dick Realtors, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-21· cited 72×
• Debbie Fiester, an Individual v. Allan Turner
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-03-05· cited 61×
• Lone Ranger Television, Inc. v. Program Radio Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-26· cited 53×
• Reeves v. Teuscher
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 47×
• Matek v. Murat
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-11-25· cited 44×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,130 Gerald T. Odom v. Joseph F. Slavik, Stephen F. Slavik, Sr., the Slavik Company and Slavik Investors
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-03-23· cited 34×
• Deutsch Energy Co. v. Sherman Mazur Richard Wall Jerome Weiner New Century Energy Corp. New Century Oil & Gas Supply Corp. Jack Ralston
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-08· cited 21×
• Koch v. Hankins
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-03-21· cited 21×