Skip to main content
· 3/1/1995

De Wit v. Firstar Corp.

Citations

  • 879 F. Supp. 947
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3469
  • 1995 WL 88203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that New York's 90-day notice-of-claim requirement applies to state tort claims brought as pendent claims in a federal action
  • holding allegation that defendants conducted enterprise’s alleged banking scheme was insufficient to allege conduct of enterprise’s affairs, where defendants were not alleged to have had some part in directing affairs of enterprise itself
  • the specificity with which fraud must be pleaded depends on the circumstances of the transaction
  • setting forth differing standards for 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.