Skip to main content
· 6/11/2004

Shell Oil Co. v. Khan

Citations

  • 138 S.W.3d 288
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 640
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 524
  • 2004 WL 1301936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Khan presented no evidence that Shell had a right to control premises conditions at the station
  • holding that Khan presented no evidence that Shell had a right to control premises conditions at the station
  • holding that mandating a particular result by a certain time is no evidence of a contractual right to control “who should do th[e] work or when”
  • holding that a dealer agreement that required dealers to train its employees in a specific manner could not be used to impose liability on the franchisor for the dealer’s failure to comply with the training requirements
  • noting that a general contractor owes the same duty as a premises owner to an independent contractor’s employee
  • noting that a general contractor owes the same duty as a premises owner to an independent contractor‘s employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brister

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.