· 6/11/2004
Shell Oil Co. v. Khan
Citations
- 138 S.W.3d 288
- 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 640
- 2004 Tex. LEXIS 524
- 2004 WL 1301936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Khan presented no evidence that Shell had a right to control premises conditions at the station
- holding that Khan presented no evidence that Shell had a right to control premises conditions at the station
- holding that mandating a particular result by a certain time is no evidence of a contractual right to control “who should do th[e] work or when”
- holding that a dealer agreement that required dealers to train its employees in a specific manner could not be used to impose liability on the franchisor for the dealer’s failure to comply with the training requirements
- noting that a general contractor owes the same duty as a premises owner to an independent contractor’s employee
- noting that a general contractor owes the same duty as a premises owner to an independent contractor‘s employee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brister
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.