Skip to main content
· 3/31/2005

McClure v. Denham

Citations

  • 162 S.W.3d 346
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 2476
  • 2005 WL 737443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that OSHA was adopted to assure safe and healthful working conditions
  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant’s motion for leave to file supplemental evidence because appellant did not show that his failure to timely produce affidavit was not intentional or the result of conscious indifference
  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant‘s motion for leave to file supplemental evidence because appellant did not show that his failure to timely produce affidavit was not intentional or the result of conscious indifference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardner, Livingston, McCOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.