Panzirer v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lack of credibility made the plaintiff an inadequate class representative where the plaintiff had given “no less than four versions of her conversation with her broker”
• finding plaintiff “gave no less than four versions of her conversation with her broker” and that her testimony was contradicted by the broker
• affirming inadequacy of named representative where plaintiff “gave no less than four versions of her conversation with her broker” so her “lack of credibility [was] abundantly clear in the record”
• affirming inadequacy of named representative where plaintiff “gave no less than four versions of her conversation with her broker” so her “lack of credibility [was] abundantly clear in the record”
• “[t]he fact that plaintiff must trace her reliance on defendant’s alleged fraud through the reactions of third parties does not vitiate her claim under 10b-5”
• “If plaintiff can link her injury to defendant’s fraud by showing the fraud was a ‘substantial’ or ‘significant contributing cause,’ plaintiff has shown sufficient reliance to support her 10b-5 claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Basic Inc. v. Levinson
  Supreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
• County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.
  E.D. New York· 1989-04-14· cited 69×
• Cromer Finance Ltd. v. Berger
  S.D. New York· 2001-12-27· cited 56×
• Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2006-09-25· cited 47×
• Gortat v. Capala Bros.
  E.D. New York· 2009-05-05· cited 44×
• In Re Gaming Lottery Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 1999-02-23· cited 35×
• Darvin v. International Harvester Co.
  S.D. New York· 1985-06-10· cited 34×
• In re Nyse Specialists Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2007-02-26· cited 33×
• Fogarazzo v. Lehman Bros.
  S.D. New York· 2005-07-27· cited 31×
• UFCW Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health & Welfare Fund v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  E.D. New York· 2008-09-05· cited 30×
• Cohen v. Laiti
  E.D. New York· 1983-07-20· cited 22×
• Weintraub v. Texasgulf Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1983-06-06· cited 19×
• Zuckerman v. Franz
  S.D. Florida· 1983-10-12· cited 15×
• Koppel v. 4987 Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2000-02-01· cited 14×
• Friedman-Katz v. Lindt & Sprungli (USA), Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2010-11-19· cited 14×
• W. Alton Jones Foundation v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1989-10-30· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
• Blackie v. Barrack
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
• Hankerson v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 371×
• Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.
  Second Circuit· 1979-09-24· cited 357×
• Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1981-04-29· cited 69×
• Kline v. Wolf
  S.D. New York· 1981-01-14· cited 63×
• Panzirer v. Wolf
  Second Circuit· 1981-10-28· cited 60×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,090 Competitive Associates, Inc. v. Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath
  Second Circuit· 1975-05-08· cited 54×