· 7/23/1984
Kirgan v. Parks
Citations
- 478 A.2d 713
- 60 Md. App. 1
- 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if cause of action exists, it does not extend to situation where testator's intent as expressed in the will has been carried out
- holding that, if cause of action exists, it does not extend to situation where testator’s intent as expressed in the will has been carried out
- Amended Complaint held to be time-barred where there were “substantial differences in [the factual] allegations [in the amended complaint] as to breach of duty.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Garrity, Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.