Skip to main content
· 10/16/1980

Clagett v. Dacy

Citations

  • 420 A.2d 1285
  • 47 Md. App. 23
  • 1980 Md. App. LEXIS 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing professional responsibility of attorneys in context of attor ney liability to third persons
  • because bidder’s interest would likely be in conflict with seller, attorney for seller had no duty to buyers at foreclosure sale
  • because bidder's interest would likely be in conflict with seller, attorney for seller had no duty to buyers at foreclosure sale
  • attorney representing seller of property had no duty to high bidders at foreclosure sale
  • general, conclusory allegations of intent to benefit third party will not suffice in attorney-client third-party context, because duties inherent in attorney-client relationship will not be presumed to flow to third parties and will not be presumed to arise by implication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Wilner, Couch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.