Aeropesca Ltd. v. Butler Aviation International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there was “no requirement” that the trial judge articulate which standard of proof the court was applying
• finding clear and convincing evidence of fraud where defendant represented to plaintiff that aircraft was airworthy even though he knew or should have known it was not
• requiring something more than merely fraudulent behavior to establish actual malice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).