Walls v. Bank of Glen Burnie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \relation back\ issue was preserved for appellate review when it was \raised in the circuit court\ in a \motion to alter or amend\
• con-cluding that “relation back” issue was preserved for appellate review when it was “raised in the circuit court” in a “motion to alter or amend”
• observing that we must “analyze[ ] the question whether a newly stated claim relate[s] back to an originally stated claim by examining whether a judgment entered on the first claim would have had a preclusive effect, under the doctrine of res judicata, on the second claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).