· 6/25/2004
Kinzel v. Discovery Drilling, Inc.
Citations
- 93 P.3d 427
- 2004 Alas. LEXIS 103
- 2004 WL 1418691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing potential claim for retaliatory discharge based on evidence suggesting that employer’s reasons for termination violated public policy
- describing how proponent bearing burden of production must establish prima facie case of given fact
- considering whether prefatory phrase \I wonder\ made allegedly defamatory statement protected conjecture
- considering whether prefatory phrase \I wonder\ made allegedly defamatory statement protected conjecture
- allowing tort remedy to protect employee whistleblowers who file safety complaints
- recognizing common law remedy for retaliatory discharge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.