Skip to main content
· 6/25/2004

Kinzel v. Discovery Drilling, Inc.

Citations

  • 93 P.3d 427
  • 2004 Alas. LEXIS 103
  • 2004 WL 1418691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing potential claim for retaliatory discharge based on evidence suggesting that employer’s reasons for termination violated public policy
  • describing how proponent bearing burden of production must establish prima facie case of given fact
  • considering whether prefatory phrase \I wonder\ made allegedly defamatory statement protected conjecture
  • considering whether prefatory phrase \I wonder\ made allegedly defamatory statement protected conjecture
  • allowing tort remedy to protect employee whistleblowers who file safety complaints
  • recognizing common law remedy for retaliatory discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.