In Re Powerhouse Licensing, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if the objecting party fails to meet its burden of showing that the document was prepared in anticipation of litigation, “the court’s inquiry ends and the documents must be produced”
• explaining that if the objecting party fails to meet its burden of showing that the document was prepared in anticipation of litigation, \the court's inquiry ends and the documents must be produced\
• explaining that if the objecting party fails to meet its burden of showing that the document was prepared in anticipation of litigation, “the court’s inquiry ends and the documents must be produced”
• explaining that if the objecting party fails to meet its burden of showing that the document was prepared in anticipation of litigation, “the court’s inquiry ends and the documents must be produced”
• finding that federal law governs the applicability of the work product doctrine
• “In a diversity case, the court applies . . . state law to resolve attorney-client claims.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).