Skip to main content

King v. State

Citations

  • 810 P.2d 119
  • 1991 Wyo. LEXIS 75
  • 1991 WL 64856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • presuming prejudice when defense counsel failed to secure trial testimony of two potential eyewitnesses
  • compelling interest in assuring that a prosecutor is countered at trial by a defense attorney who is aggressive and effective enough to make the adversarial process perform as designed
  • presuming prejudice due to King's attorney's unjustified failure to investigate by interviewing or securing trial testimony of two potential eyewitnesses
  • presuming prejudice due to counsel’s unjustified failure to investigate the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbigkit, Thomas, Cardine, MacY, Golden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.