Wyoming Supreme Court· 4/29/1991
King v. State
Citations
- 810 P.2d 119
- 1991 Wyo. LEXIS 75
- 1991 WL 64856
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presuming prejudice when defense counsel failed to secure trial testimony of two potential eyewitnesses
- compelling interest in assuring that a prosecutor is countered at trial by a defense attorney who is aggressive and effective enough to make the adversarial process perform as designed
- presuming prejudice due to King's attorney's unjustified failure to investigate by interviewing or securing trial testimony of two potential eyewitnesses
- presuming prejudice due to counsel’s unjustified failure to investigate the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbigkit, Thomas, Cardine, MacY, Golden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 65×
- Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-02-06· cited 56×
- Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-10-25· cited 55×
- Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-04-02· cited 49×
- Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-10-18· cited 47×
- Kolb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 46×
- Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-02-05· cited 45×
- Mills v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-07-20· cited 36×
- Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-11-06· cited 30×
- Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-07-22· cited 29×
- Shongutsie v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-02-24· cited 25×
- Grainey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-03-03· cited 24×
- Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2005-07-20· cited 23×
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-02-13· cited 23×
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 22×
- Boucher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-01-04· cited 20×
- Page v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 20×
- Strickland v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2004-07-30· cited 19×
- Bear Cloud v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-02-09· cited 18×
- Mellott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2019-02-28· cited 16×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-07-30· cited 1,208×
- Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 1,161×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 813×
- Ex Parte WelbornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-03-14· cited 509×
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 398×
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-05-22· cited 260×
- United States v. Tyrone Anthony GrayThird Circuit· 1989-06-22· cited 247×
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaThird Circuit· 1980-05-08· cited 223×
- Willie D. White v. Richard Frank, Freeman Marshall, City of PoughkeepsieSecond Circuit· 1988-08-24· cited 164×
- Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 163×
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-11-20· cited 128×
- United States v. Joseph Vincent Agosto, United States of America v. Deil Otto Gustafson, United States of America v. Joan Lorrain NorrisEighth Circuit· 1982-04-09· cited 111×
- James A. Brien v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1982-12-08· cited 97×
- Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-05-19· cited 89×
- Manfred Lewis Estes v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1989-08-28· cited 83×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of RichardsonWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 79×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.